- 29 October 2015
Article/Publication Details
Views: 6763
THE TRANSFORMED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POSSIBILITY AND REALITY:
LÁSZLÓ TENGELYI’S THESIS ON THE FUNDAMENTAL TENDENCY IN CONTEMPORARY FRENCH PHENOMENOLOGY
| Title in the language of publication: | VERWANDLUNG DES VERHÄLTNISSES VON MÖGLICHKEIT UND WIRKLICHKEIT: LÁSZLÓ TENGELYIS THESE ÜBER DIE GRUNDTENDENZ DER NEUEN PHÄNOMENOLOGIE IN FRANKREICH |
| Author: | Nagasaka Masumi |
| Issue: | HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology. Vol. 3, №2 (2014), 21-34 |
| Language: | German |
| Document Type: | Research Article |
| DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2014-3-2-21-34 | PDF (Downloads: 4729) |
Abstract
In New phenomenology in France, László Tengelyi invites us to think about the transformed relationship between the notions of
possibility and reality in the contemporary French phenomenology. To justify his thesis, he proposes to examine Marc Richir’s
criticism of «transcendental Ideals» in Husserl’s and Heidegger’s phenomenology. In considering, next to Tengelyi, Richir’s
revisit of phenomenology as an extension of the Kantian criticism of ontotheological metaphysics, the present study aims to
develop three main ideas. First, it scrutinizes Kantian criticism of the ontological argument in Critique of Pure Reason. The
ontological argument considers transcendental Ideal as a reality, with there being confusion between an object of pure thinking
and one of knowledge. Second, this study aims to clarify the way in which Richir also applies Kantian criticism to Husserl’s
transcendental eidetics as well as to Heidegger’s existential analytic, in Experience of Thinking – Phenomenology, Philosophy,
Mythology and Phantasia, Imagination, Affecitivity. On the one hand, by analyzing Husserlian manuscripts on transcendental
intersubjectivity, Richir uncovers a disguised form of the transcendental Ideal, incorporated in the notion of form of essence or
«Eidos» of the existing I; this notion is presupposed as a condition of passage from the possibility to the reality of the Other. On
the other hand, Richir discovers in the Heideggerian description of «anticipation of death» in Being and Time, a dissimulated
concept of the transcendental Ideal that takes a form of the Dasein’s «ownmost» [eigenst] factual possibility. Ultimately, the
main purpose of the current study is to show that contemporary French phenomenology intends to
transcendental Ideal, which is considered a reality that presupposes the total sum of possibilities.
Key words
Marc Richir, Kant, Husserl, Heidegger, ontological argument, transcendental Ideal, anticipation of death,
transcendental intersubjectivity, ontotheological metaphysics.
References
- Descartes, R. (1941). Méditations. In A. Bridoux (Ed.), Œuvres et lettres (147–225). Paris: Gallimard.
- Gondek, H.-D., & Tengelyi, L. (2011). Neue Phänomenologie in Frankreich. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
- Heidegger, M. (1975). Brief über den Humanismus. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (2001). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
- Husserl, E. (1973 a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil. 1921–28. (Hua XIV). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Husserl, E. (1973 b). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil. 1929–35. (Hua XV). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. (Hua XIX). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Janicaud, D. (2009). Le tournant théologique de la phénoménologie française. In La phénoménologie dans tous ses états (39–149). Paris: Gallimard.
- Kant, I. (1910). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781/1787). Berlin: Georg Reimer.
- Kant, I. (1911 a). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Zweite Aufl. (Vol. III). Berlin: Georg Reimer.
- Kant, I. (1911 b). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Erste Aufl. (Vol. IV). Berlin: Georg Reimer.
- Leibniz, G. W. (2001). Discours de métaphysique et autres textes (1663–1689). Paris: Flammarion.
- Levinas, E. (1990). Totalité et infini. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.
- Richir, M. (1996). L'expérience du penser – Phénoménologie, philosophie, mythologie. Grenoble: Million.
- Richir, M. (2004). Phantasia, imagination, affectivité. Grenoble: Millon.
- 29 October 2015
Article/Publication Details
Views: 5831
CONSTITUTING OF PLURAL IMAGES OF SCIENCE
AS A HISTORICAL TASK OF PHENOMENOLOGY
| Title in the language of publication: | КОНСТИТУИРОВАНИЕ ПЛЮРАЛИЗМА ОБРАЗОВ НАУКИ КАК ИСТОРИЧЕСКАЯ ЗАДАЧА ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИИ |
| Author: | Sergey Kulikov |
| Issue: | HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology. Vol. 3, №2 (2014), 9-20 |
| Language: | Russian |
| Document Type: | Research Article |
| DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2014-3-2-9-20 | PDF (Downloads: 4879) |
Abstract
The main purpose of article is representation of conceptual introduction to a cycle of the future researches devoted to
reconstruction of phenomenological views on processes of creation of images of science. That purpose is achieved as a result of
detection of key features (the conceptual bases) of pre-phenomenological and phenomenological ways of a reflection of science.
Research leans on a method of the comparative analysis. Classical and non-classical variant of creation of images of science were
compared. Members of classical philosophy assumed that there is a way to present science in an image of unity of knowledge.
Such image could be valid without any exceptions. Since works of Neo-kantianism, modern philosophy has developed the idea
that creation of a uniform image of science is problematic. The phenomenology keeps classical idea of unity of images of science,
but the unity is interpreted as a complex of «comprehension» intensions of consciousness. Such complex of intensions gives
the horizon of judgment of each of images of science in terms of their relations to concrete subject domain. Theoretical value of
the work consists in identification of conditions under which phenomenological approach leads to institutionalization of the
pluralistic image of science. As a result research leads to the original conclusion that the problem of phenomenology consists in
constituting a pluralistic image of science.
Key words
Philosophical and methodological studies, classical philosophy, non-classical philosophy, phenomenology, mission
of phenomenology, uniformity of scientific knowledge, pluralism of images of science.
References
- Aristotel'. (1976). Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Collected Works in Four Volumes. Volume 1.]. Moscow: Mysl' (in Russian).
- Bast, R. A. (1986). Der Wissenschaftsbegriff Martin Heideggers im Zusammenhang seiner Philosophie. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
- Bruzina, R. (2010). Husserl's “Naturalism” and Genetic Phenomenology. New Yearbook for Phenomenology & Phenomenology Philosophy, 10 (1), 91–125.
- Casement, W. (1988). Husserl and Philosophy of History. History and Theory, 27 (3), 229–240.
- Davidson, D. (1993). Ob idee kontseptual'noi skhemy [On Very Idea of the Conceptual Scheme]. In A. F. Gryaznov (Ed.), Analiticheskaya filosofiya. Izbrannye teksty [Analytical Philosophy. Selected Texts] (144–159). Moscow: Moscow State University Press. (in Russian).
- Gadamer, H.-G. (2000). Dialekticheskaya etika Platona (Fenomenologicheskaya interpretatsiya “Fileba”) [Plato's Dialectical Ethics (Phenomenological Interpretation of “Phileb”)]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society Publ. (in Russian).
- Gegel', G. V. F. (1975). Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. Tom 2. Filosofiya prirody [Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Volume 2. Philosophy of Nature]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
- Gegel', G. V. F. (1999). Nauka logiki [Science of Logic]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
- Glazebrook, T. (2000). From Physis to Nature, Technê to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo and Newton. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 38 (1), 95–118.
- Gusserl', E. (2000). Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya. [Logical Investigations. Cartesian Meditations]. Moscow: AST. (in Russian).
- Kant, I. (1998). Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
- Kant, I. (1999). Metafizicheskie nachala estestvoznaniya [Metaphysical Origins of Natural Sciences]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
- Kassirer, E. (2002). Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. Tom 1 [Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 1]. St. Petersburg: University Book Publ. (in Russian).
- Khaideger, M. (1993). Raboty i razmyshleniya raznykh let [Works and Essays of Different Years]. Moscow: Gnozis. (in Russian).
- Khaideger, M. (2003). Bytie i vremya [Being and Time]. Khar'kov: Folio. (in Russian).
- Konopka, A. (2008). A Renewal of Husserl's Critique of Naturalism. Environmental Philosophy, 5 (1), 37–59.
- Kulikov, S. B. (2005). Voprosy stanovleniya predmetnoi i problemnoi oblastei filosofii nauki [Questions of Formation of Subject and Problem Domain of Philosophy of Science]. Tomsk: Tomsk State Pedagogical Press. (in Russian).
- Kurtz, P. (1969). Phenomenology and Naturalism. Journal of History of Philosophy, 7 (1), 74–78.
- Lembeck, K.-H. (2010). Philosophie als Zumutung? Ihre Rolle im Kanon der Wissenschaften. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
- Moran, D. (2008). Husserl's Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism. Continental Philosophy Review, (41), 401–425.
- Platon, (1998). Apologiya Sokrata, Kriton, Ion, Protagor [Apology of Socrates, Kriton, Ion, Protagor]. Moscow: Mysl'. (in Russian).
- Rikkert, H. (2000). Filosofiya zhizni [Philosophy of Life]. Moscow: AST. (in Russian).
- Shtreker, E. (1996). Gusserlevskaya ideya fenomenologii kak obosnovyvayushchei teorii nauki [Husserl's Idea of Phenomenology as Proving Theory of Science]. In Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki [Modern Philosophy of Science] (376–392). Moscow: Logos. (in Russian).
- Wagner, H. R. (1972). Husserl and Historicism. Social Research, 39 (4), 696–719.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social networks:
