Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 4629


PAUL RICŒUR
THE RULE OF METAPHOR. STUDY 8. METAPHOR AND PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE
Continuation

Title in the language of publication: ПОЛЬ РИКЁР
ЖИВАЯ МЕТАФОРА. ВОСЬМОЙ ОЧЕРК. МЕТАФОРА И ФИЛОСОФСКИЙ ДИСКУРС
ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ. НАЧАЛО В ТОМЕ 2(2) 2013
Translation from French: Fedor Stanzhevskiy
Editor: Galina Vdovina
Issue:HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 3, №1 (2014),  215-236
Language:Russian
Document Type:Translation
Translated from:Ricœur P. (1975). La métaphore vive. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
DOI : 10.18199/2226-5260-2014-3-1-215-236 PDF (Downloads: 3281)

Abstract
The second part of the chapter eight of the “Rule of Metaphor” deals with further philosophical implications of the metaphor. Ricoeur dissipates any suspicion of complicity between the metaphorical and metaphysical. He shows that it is due to a wrong understanding of the metaphor as embedded in nomination, while its proper place, as Ricoeur insists, is in discourse. The living metaphor is a principle animating thought and inciting it “to think more”. The very relationship between thought and poetry, between speculative and metaphorical discourses proves to be a dynamic process based on the dialectics between the poetical experience of belonging and the speculative power of distancing.

Key words
Metaphor, literal and figurative, speculative discourse, lexicalization, resemblance, reference.

References

  • Aristote, (1953). La Métaphysique. Paris: Vrin.
  • Aristote, (1959). Éthique à Nicomaque. Paris: Vrin.
  • Aristote, (1969). Poétique. Paris: Belles Lettres.
  • Aristote, (1973). Rhétorique. Paris: Belles Lettres.
  • Breton, S. (1971). Du Principe. Paris: Bibl. Des Sc. Rel.
  • Décarie, V. (1961). L'objet de la Métaphysique selon Aristote. Montreal-Paris: Vrin
  • Greisch, J. (1973a). Les mots et les roses. La Metaphore chez Martin Heidegger. Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques, 57 (3), 443–456.
  • Greisch, J. (1973b). Identité et différence dans la pensée de Martin Heidegger. Le chemin de l'Ereignis. Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques, 57(1), 71–111.
  • Hegel, G.W.F. (1939). Phénoménologie de l'Esprit. Paris: Aubier.
  • Heidegger, M. (1954). Aus der Erfahrung des Denkens. Pfullingen: Neske.
  • Heidegger, M. (1956). Was ist das — die Philosophie? Pfullingen: Neske.
  • Heidegger, M. (1959). Unterwegs zur Sprache. Pfullingen: Neske.
  • Heidegger, M. (1969). Zur Sache des Denkens. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Was heisst Denken? Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1913). Logische Untersuchungen. Halle: Niemeyer.
  • Husserl, E. (1950). Ideen I. (Hua III). Den Haag: Nijhoff.
  • Ladrière, J. (1975). Discours théologique et symbole. Revue des sciences religieuses, 49 (1–2), 116–141.
  • Lafoucrière, O. (1967). Le Destin de la pensée et la mort de Dieu selon Heideggger. The Hague: Nijhoff.
  • Pöggeler, O. (1963). Der Denkweg Martin Heideggers. Pfullingen: Neske.
  • Price, H. H. (1953). Thinking and Experience. London-New York: Hutchinson's University Library.
  • Puntel, L. B. (1969). Analogie und Geschichtlichkeit. Freiburg: Herder.
  • Kant, I. (1965). Critique de la Faculté déjuger. Paris: Vrin.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1970). Qu'est-ce qu'un texte. Hermeneutik und Dialektik, Festschrift, (2), 181–200.
  • Ricoeur P. (1973a). The Task of Hermeneutics. Philosophy Today, 17(2–4), 112–128.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1973b). The Hermeneutical Function of Distantiation. Philosophy Today, 17(2– 4), 129–141.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1973c). Herméneutique et la critique des idéologies. In Castelli (Ed.), Démythologisation et Idéologie (25–64). Paris: Aubier.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1975). La Métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil.
  • Uwe, A. (1965). Die Entelechie. Wien-Munchen: Oldenburg.