Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 198


THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF EUGEN FINK’S ARTICLE “THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY OF EDMUND HUSSERL AND CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM”

Title in the language of publication: ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ К ПЕРЕВОДУ СТАТЬИ ОЙГЕНА ФИНКА «ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОСОФИЯ ЭДМУНДА ГУССЕРЛЯ В СОВРЕМЕННОЙ КРИТИКЕ»
Author: EVGENIYA SHESTOVA
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 14, №2 (2025), 638–645
Language: Russian
Document type: Preface to the Translation
EDN MFQSKT PDF (Downloads: 198)

Abstract
In the preface to the translation of E. Fink’s article “The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism” I explicate the historical and problematic context of the work. The article was planned by Fink as the first part of a two-part polemic with two philosophical schools: criticism (neo-Kantians) and “philosophy of life”, but the second part wasn’t written. Eugen Fink uses the metaphoric of a trial and writes a kind of “Apology of Phenomenology”. He points out the erroneous insinuations against Husserl’s phenomenology and explains that they are based on a misunderstanding of the basic ideas of phenomenology. In the second half of the article, Fink presents his interpretation of Husserl’s phenomenology. It coincides mainly with the contents of the VI Cartesian Meditation. The article can be understood as a non-technical presentation of the main themes of the VI Meditation, aimed at a non-phenomenological reader. Very interesting is the preface to the article by E. Husserl, who expresses complete agreement with the interpretation of phenomenology provided below. Husserl has made numerous polemical comments on the VI Meditation, but authorizes the same ideas presented in the “Kant-Studien” article. Nevertheless, the Husserl’s recommendation of this article, as shown, was not a tactical move; it is confirmed by the praises in Husserl’s private correspondence. Such a creditable preface makes Fink a kind of porte-parole of Husserlian phenomenology, and the article becomes one of the most influential texts for the interpretation of Husserl’s phenomenology in France in the 1940s–1960s.

Keywords
E. Fink, E. Husserl, phenomenology, criticism, reduction, world, transcendental philosophy.

References

  • Bruzina, R. (2004). Edmund Husserl and Eugen Fink: Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology, 1928–1938. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Fink, E. (1970). The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism. In R. O. Elveton (Ed), The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings (90–147). Chicago: Quadrangle Press.
  • (2008). Phänomenologische Werkstatt. Band 2: Die Bernauer Zeitmanuscripte, Cartesianische Meditationen und System der phänomenologiscen Philosophie. Freiburg, München: Karl Alber.
  • Husserl, E. (1994a). Briefwechsel III: Die Göttinger Schule. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Husserl, E. (1994b). Briefwechsel IV: Die Freiburger Schüler. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Husserl, E. (1994c). Briefwechsel IX: Familienbriefe. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Lawlor, L. (2002). Derrida and Husserl. The Basic Problem of Phenomenology. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
  • Shestova, E. (2019). Astonishment as Event and Beginning of Phenomenology in the Early Works of E. Fink. Annual for Phenomenological Philosophy, 5, 76–91. (In Russian)
  • Yampolskaya, A. (2012). Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and Biography. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera Publ. (In Russian)