Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 1096


DALE JACQUETTE
ALEXIUS MEINONG, THE SHEPHERD OF NON-BEING
Moscow: Kanon + ROOI “Reabilitatsiia”, 2023. ISBN 978-5-88373-782-3

Title in the language of publication: РЕЦЕНЗИЯ НА КНИГУ Д.ЖАККЕТТА «АЛЕКСИУС МАЙНОНГ, ПАСТЫРЬ НЕ-БЫТИЯ»
Москва: Канон + РООИ «Реабилитация», 2023. ISBN 978-5-88373-782-3
Author: ANDREI PATKUL
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 13, №2 (2021), 280–289
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2024-13-1-280–289 PDF (Downloads: 1096)

Abstract
In my review, I evaluate the first translation of Dale Jacquette’s book entitled Alexius Meinong, The Shepherd of Non-Being into Russian. First of all, I point out the relevance of the publication of this translation. It is conditioned, in my view, by the fact that the person of Alexius Meinong—one of the important representatives of the school of Franz Brentano—still remains undeservedly forgotten and not enough studied in both domestic and foreign history of philosophy. At the same time, studying the legacy of Meinong could shed the light on the peculiarity of the processes that took place in European philosophy at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries, as well as show the common sources of such divergent directions in modern philosophy as analytical philosophy and phenomenology. Moreover, philosophy of Meinong could discover some perspectives for modern thought that other philosophers of the past cannot indicate. All these points, in my opinion, are taken into account in Jacquette’s monograph. The advantage of his research is that he reconstructs the philosophy of Meinong, his theory of objects in a very broad historical and philosophical context of both phenomenological (F.Brentano, E.Husserl) and analytical (B.Russell, W.V.O.Quine, D.K.Lewis, S.Kripke) traditions. Systematically, the center of Meinong’s theory of objects is the doctrine of so-called Außersein of the objects, which can be considered not only as existing, but as not yet existing, no longer existing and even impossible. As conclusion, I criticize the translations of some of Meinong/Jacquette terms used in the monograph under review.

Keywords
Alexius Meinong, theory of objects, intentional objects, Außersein, intensionalism, extensionalism, extra-ontology.

References

  • Aristotle. (1976). Works in 4 volumes. Vol. 1. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
  • Jacquette, D. (2015). Alexius Meining, The Shepherd of Non-Being. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
  • Jacquette, D. (2023). Alexius Meining, The Shepherd of Non-Being. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Kanon + ROOI Reabilitatsiia Publ. (In Russian)
  • Mironov, D. (2022). Alexius Meinong’s Semantic Investigations in the Context of Brentanist Philosophy of Language. ESSE: Studies in Philosophy and Theology, 7 (1/2), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.31119/essephts.2022.7.1–2.2 (In Russian)
  • Popik, O. (2013). The Theory of Objects by A. Minong and Universal Nature of Logical Laws. Vestinik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 9 (63), 46–51. (In Russian).
  • Seliverstov, V. (2021). Alexius Meinong’s Extraontology. Beyond Being and Non-Being. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 58 (1), 220–234. (In Russian)
  • Vdovina, G. (2022a). Alexius Meinong’s Theory of Objects Is Looking for a Home. ESSE: Studies in Philosophy and Theology, 7 (1/2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.31119/essephts.2022.7.1–2.1 (In Russian)
  • Vdovina, G. (2022b). The Late Scholastic Roots of Alexius Meinong’s Theory of Objects. The Philosophy Journal, 15 (1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-1-5-20