Article/Publication Details
Views: 1732

SCHELLINGIAN MOTIVES IN M. RICHIR’S PHENOMENOLOGY: PHENOMENOLOGICAL UNCONSCIOUSNESS AND TRANSCENDENTAL HYPNOSE

Abstract
The article provides a philosophical reconstruction of the composition of key motives in the phenomenological project of Mark Richir, who is known for his criticism of the symbolic institution. Following Richir’s deep inspiration in Schelling’s philosophy allows to find connections between his theory of the phenomenological unconscious and affectivity, his commentaries concerning Greek mythology and mythological thinking in La Naissance de Dieux—and his political theory. Along with general historical and philosophical comments on a number of translations of Schelling into French, Richir repeatedly refers to Schelling in his own theoretical arguments. The research shows how some of Richir’s concepts — in particular, his interpretation of the phenomenological unconsciousness, myth, the Protean nature of power, the change of grand epochs as a change of types of the symbolic institutions of power—can be understood on the basis of relevant passages from Schelling’s philosophy, and how a semantic genealogical connection between them can be built. By considering the importance of the phenomenological unconsciousness in the course of phenomenalization process as described in Richir’s works, it is proposed to contrast the interpretation of the unconsciousness, which retains its simple mystery and the ways of dealing, with it in Richir’s version: while psychoanalysis is striving for the “disenchantment” of the unconsciousness by means of translating it into the symbolic language and transferring the living potentiation of meaning into the reproduction of a symptom. Richir’s phenomenological appeal to mythology turns out to be a non-trivial shift from theoretical philosophy to practical philosophy. The article also pays attention to the theory of power in Richir and Lefort, which presumably dates back to La Boétie. It is proposed to reveal the antithesis of the imaginary policy of the despot proposed by Richir, reproducing the symbolic institution of power and supporting the transcendental illusion of the need for control and order in the form of a kind of “hypnosis”—and real politics as a praxis of freedom.

Keywords
Richir, Schelling, phenomenological unconsciousness, phenomenalization, affectivity, mythology, sublime, tyrannic, transcendental hypnosis.

References

• Carlson, S., & Yampolskaya, A. (2020). On the Frontline of Phenomenological Experience. The Preface to the Translation of the First of “Phenomenological Meditations” by Marc Richir. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 9 (1), 275–282. (In Russian)
• Chernavin, G. I. (2018). The Oddity of the Taken for Granted. St. Petersburg, Moscow: Dobrosvet Publ. (In Russian)
• Detistova, A. (2012). The Phenomenological Project of M. Richir: Fantasy as a Dimension of the Phenomenological. Voprosy filosofii, 6, 139–148. (In Russian)
• Forestier, F. (2015). La phénoménologie génétique de Marc Richir. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
• La Boétie, É. (1952). Reasoning about Voluntary Slavery (F. A. Kogan-Bernshtein, Trans.). Moscow: Izd-vo Akademii nauk USSR Publ. (In Russian)
• Lefort, C. (1986). The Political Forms of Modern Society Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism (John B. Tompson, Ed., Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1999). Mythologists in 4 vol.: Vol. 1. Raw and Cooked. Rus. Ed. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga Publ. (In Russian)
• Maldiney, H. (1973). Regard, Parole, Espace. Lausanne: Éditions L’Âge d’Homme.
• Mesnil, J. (1994). L’anthropologie phénoménologique de Marc Richir. Revue internationale de psychopathologie, 16, 643–664.
• Richir, M. (1982). Barbarie et Civilisation. Réseaux, 41–42–43, 21–43.
• Richir, M. (1988a). Phenomenologie et institution symbolique (Phenomenes, temps et etres II). Paris: Jerome Millon.
• Richir, M. (1988b). Sauvagerie et utopie metaphysique. In F. W. J. Schelling, Les âges du monde (5–34). Bruxelles: Editions OUSIA S. C.
• Richir, M. (1989). Du sublime en politique. Synthesis Philosophica, 8 (2), 411–430.
• Richir, M. (1990). La mélancolie des philosophes. In Anuales de V Instituí de Philosophie de l’Université de Bruxelles: L’Affect philosophe (11–34). Paris: Vrin.
• Richir, M. (1991). Passion du penser et pluralité phénoménologique des mondes. Epokhé, 2, 113–173.
• Richir, M. (1994). Qu’est-ce que un Dieu? Mythologie et question de la pensée. In F. W. J. Schelling, Philosophie de la mythologie (7–85). Grenoble: Jéróme Millón.
• Richir, M. (1995). La naissance des dieux. Paris: Hachette.
• Richir, M. (1996a). Affectivité sauvage, affectivité humaine: animalité et tyrannie. Epokhe, 6, 75–115.
• Richir, M. (1996b). L’événement dans la création. In J. Greisch & G. Florival, Création et Evénement, Autour de Jean Ladrière. Actes du colloque de Cerisy-La-salle (123–144). Coll. Bibliothèque de Philosophie de Louvain.
• Richir, M. (2001). Inconscient, nature et mythologie chez Schelling. In A. Roux & M. Vetö (Eds.), Schelling et l’élan du Système de l’idéalisme transcendantal (133–148). Paris: L’Harmattan.
• Richir, M. (2002). Narrativité, temporalité et évènement dans la pensée mythique. Annales de Phénoménologie, 153–169.
• Richir, M. (2005). La nature aime à se cacher. Kairos, 26, 77–92.
• Richir, M. (2011). La contingence du Despote. Eikasia: revista de filosofía, 40, 129–136.
• Richir, M. (2014). On the Phenomenological Unconscious: Epoche, Blinking and Reduction Phenomenological. In S. Sholokhova & A. Yampol’skaya (Eds.), (Post)fenomenologiia. Novaia fenomenologiia vo Frantsii i za ee predelami (209–228). Rus. Ed. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian).
• Richir, M. (2015). Hyperbole dans la philosophie positive de Schelling: Approche phénoménologique. In G. Bensussan, L. Hühn & P. Schwa (Eds.), L’héritage de Schelling / Das Erbe Schelling (41–52). Freiburg; München: Verlag Karl Alber.
• Richir, M. (2020). Defenestration. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 9 (1), 760–781. (In Russian)
• Sartre, J.-P. (2001). Imaginary. Phenomenological Psychology of Imagination. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
• Schelling, F. W. J. (1861). Die Weltalter. In A. H. K. Schelling (Ed.), Sämtliche Werke. Abt. 1. Bd. 8, ed. (195–344). Stuttgart, Augsburg: J. G. Cottascher Verlag.
• Schelling, F. W. J. (1987). Collected Works in 2 vols.: Vol. 1. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Schelling, F. W. J. (1989). Collected Works in 2 vols.: Vol. 2. Rus. Ed. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)
• Schelling, F. W. J. (2013). Philosophy of Mythology in 2 vols.: Vol. 2. Rus. Ed. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press Publ. (In Russian)
• Schnell, A. (2015). Considérations sur l’inconscient phénoménologique. Annales de Phénoménologie, 205–220.
• Schnell, A. (2019). Réflexions sur le mouvement de pensée de Marc Richir. In Aux marges de la phénoménologie. Lectures de Marc Richir (79–93). Paris: Hermann Éditeurs.
• Vvedenskyi, A. (2020). I’m sorry I’m not a Beast. St. Petersburg: Pushkinskii dom Publ. (In Russian)
• Yampolskaya, A. (2017). Phenomenological Reduction as Artistic Device. Voprosy Filosofii, 2, 195–205. (In Russian)
• Wirth, J., & Burke, P. (Eds). (2013). The Barbarian Principle. Merleau-Ponty, Schelling and the Question of Nature. Albany: SUNY Press.