Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 2152


DIALOGIC PHENOMENOLOGY OF PAIN EXPERIENCE
SAULIUS GENIUSAS
THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF PAIN
Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2020. ISBN 978-0-8214-2403-2

Title in the language of publication: DIALOGIC PHENOMENOLOGY OF PAIN EXPERIENCE
SAULIUS GENIUSAS
THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF PAIN
Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2020. ISBN 978-0-8214-2403-2
Author: VITALIY LEKHTSIER
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 10, №1 (2021), 328-341
Language: English
Document type: Book review
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2021-10-1-328-341 PDF (Downloads: 1888)

Abstract
The review focuses on Saulius Geniusas’ book, The Phenomenology of Pain. In this study, Geniusas develops his own systematic phenomenology of the experience of pain, based primarily on the conceptual resources of Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology. In doing so, the philosopher formulates and successfully implements original methodological principles of “dialogical phenomenology.” Such a phenomenology consists of, on the one hand, strict phenomenological analysis of pain based on the methods of epoché, phenomenological reduction and eidetic variation, and on the other hand, of actual and partly polemical inclusion of phenomenological point of view in the ongoing discussion of pain in the social and biological sciences. The author manages to do this by supplementing his eidetic analysis of the essence of pain experience with the method of “factual variations” and by appealing to the analytical optics of Husserl’s late genetic phenomenology. This way the book reflects—on strictly phenomenological grounds—numerous findings from the sociology and biology of pain. The book relies on the tradition of phenomenological research, offers a conceptual reconstruction of the key dispute about pain that took place in this tradition (between Franz Brentano and Carl Stump) and, in its turn, grounds the positive sciences of pain in the direct evidence of experience itself.

Keywords
phenomenology, eidetics, pain, intentionality, stratified experience, sensation, feeling.

References

  • Becker, G. (2004) Phenomenology of Health and Illness. In Ember, C.R. & Ember, M. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology. Health and Illness in the World’s Cultures Topics, Vol. 1; Cultures, Vol. 2 (125-136), New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Brentano, F. (1996). Selected Works. Rus. Ed. Moskva: Dom intellektual’noi knigi, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo Publ. (In Russian)
  • Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1962). Pain: Its Modes and Functions (Eda O’Shiel, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Craig, K. D. (2009). The Social Communication Model of Pain. Canadian Psychology, 50, 22–32. doi: 10.1037/a0014772
  • Cohen, M., Quintner, О, & Rysewyk S. van (2018). Reconsidering the International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain. PAIN Reports, 3 (2), 1-7. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000634
  • Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and Illness: Distinctions Between Professional and Popular Ideas of Sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 1, 9–23.
  • Frank, A. W. (1997). Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fizette, D., Koniaev, S., & Sultanova, M. (2017). Love and Hate: Brentano and Stumpf on Emotions and Sense-Feeling. Filosofskaia antropologiia, 2, 161-178. doi: 10.21146/2414-3715-2017-3-2-161-178. (In Russian)
  • Geniusas, S. (2014). The Origins of the Phenomenology of Pain: Brentano, Stumpf and Husserl. Continental Philosophy Review, 47 (1), 1–17.
  • Geniusas, S. (2016). Max Scheler’s Phenomenology of Pain. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 11 (3), 358–76.
  • Geniusas, S. (2017a). Phenomenology of Chronic Pain: De-Personalization and Re-Personalization. In Rysewyk, S. Van (Ed.), Meanings of Pain (147–64). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Geniusas, S. (2017b). Pain and Intentionality. In Walton, R., Taguchi S. & Rubio R. (Eds.), Perception, Affectivity, and Volition in Husserl’s Phenomenology (113–36). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Geniusas, S. (2020). Beyond Naturalism and Social Constructionism: The Function of Phenomenology in Pain Research. Topos, 1, 137-157.
  • Gergel, T. L. (2012). Medicine and the Individual: Is Phenomenology the Answer? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18 (5), 1102–1109.
  • Good, B. J. (1994). Medicine, Rationality, and Experience. An Anthropological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Good, M. J. Del V., Brodwin P., Good, B. J., & Kleinman, A. (Eds.). (1994). Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Grüny, C. (2004). Zerstörte Erfahrung: Eine Phänomenologie des Schmerzes. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
  • Husserl, E. (1999). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Rus. Ed. Moskva: Dom intellektual’noi knigi Publ. (In Russian)
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Collected Works. Т. 3 (1). Logical Investigations, vol. II (1) . Rus. Ed. Moskva: Dom intellektual’noi knigi Publ. (In Russian)
  • Khaidarova, G. R. (2013). The Phenomenon of Pain in Culture. Sankt-Peterburg: Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii Publ. (In Russian)
  • Kleinman, A. (1988). The Illness Narratives. Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books.
  • Landgrebe, L. (2018). The Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. Rus. Ed. Sankt-Peteruburg: Russkii Mir Publ. (In Russian)
  • Leriche, R. (1961). Basics of Physiological Surgery. Rus. Ed. Leningrad: Medgiz Publ. (In Russian)
  • Lekhtsier, V. L. (2018). Illness: Experience, Narrative, Hope. Essay on Social and Humanitarian Research in Medicine. Vil’nius: Logvino literatūros namai Publ. (In Russian)
  • Morris, D. B. (1993). The Culture of Pain. Berkeley and Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.
  • Olivier, A. (2007). Being in Pain. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
  • Scarry, E. (1985). The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rysewyk, S. van. (Ed.). (2016). Meanings of Pain: A Call for Study on the Meanings of Pain. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Sartre, J.-P. (2002). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Rus. Ed. Moskva: TERRA Publ. (In Russian)
  • Stumpf, C. (1916). Apologie der Gefühlsemfindungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 75, 330–350.
  • Stumpf, C. (1928). Gefühl und Gefühlsempfindung. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.