Article/Publication Details
Views: 2993

PHENOMENOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ECONOMICS: SCHÜTZ VERSUS DÜPPE

Abstract
The article explores novel directions in the phenomenology of economics. It analyzes how the approaches of Till Düppe and Alfred Schütz, both inspired by Edmund Husserl, may shed light on the historical development of economics. I examine the substance and meaning of economics in the context of the forceful criticism of the whole discipline recently raised by Düppe. This examination uncovers important weaknesses and omissions inherent in Düppe’s argument against the economists’ scientific aspirations. The analysis of the social scientific endeavors by Alfred Schütz who develops a phenomenologically informed ‘telescopic’ concept of an ideal type is then shown to be a more fruitful and methodologically rigorous way towards understanding the developments within economics. The Schützian view permits us to see how abstract economic models originate in the experience of the life-world and are continuous with it. Accordingly, the historical development of economic science may be viewed as consisting from two broadly defined phases, where at first the formalism is steadily increasing (the ‘zooming out’ phase) and later the discipline converges back to context-specific empirical examinations (the ‘zooming in’ phase). A case study concentrating on the economic theory of politics illustrates that both the drive towards abstraction that has culminated around 1950s and the more recent ‘zooming in’ is methodologically legitimate from the phenomenological point of view. I conclude that economics has never been completely severed from the paramount reality of the everyday life and for decades the interconnection has been growing stronger by the day.

Key words
Alfred Schütz, crisis of science, formalism, historicism, life-world, phenomenology of economics, telescopic ideal type.

References

• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, New York, London: J. Wiley / Chapman & Hall.
• Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2005). Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (3), 131–145. doi: 10.1257/089533005774357897
• Becker, G. S. (1978). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Dowding, K. (2005). Is it Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a Suggestion. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7 (3), 442–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00188.x
• Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Harper and Row. 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00188.x
• Düppe, T. (2011). The Making of the Economy: A Phenomenology of Economic Science. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
• Friedman, M. (1953). Methodology of Positive Economics. In M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics (3–16, 30–43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: a Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
• Knudsen, C. (2004). Alfred Schütz, Austrian Economists and the Knowledge Problem. Rationality and Society, 16 (1), 45–89. doi: 10.1177/1043463104036622
• Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lazear, E. P. (2000). Economic Imperialism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (1), 99–146. doi: 10.2307/2586936
• Prendergast, C. (1986). Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School of Economics. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (1), 1–26.
• Robbins, L. (2007). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Auburn, Al.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
• Rosenberg, A. (1994). Economics — Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Rosenberg, A. (2005). Lessons from Biology for Philosophy of the Human Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35 (1), 3–19. doi: 10.1177/0048393104271921
• Schütz, A. (1972). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
• Schütz, A. (1974a). Common-sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers, Vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality (1–47). Berlin: Springer.
• Schütz, A. (1974b). On Multiple Realities. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers, Vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality (207–259). Berlin: Springer.
• Schütz, A. (1975). The Problem of Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl. In I. Schütz (Ed.), Collected Papers, Vol. 3: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy (51–91). Berlin: Springer.
• Schütz, A. (1976a). Dimensions of the Social World. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Studies in Social Theory (20–63). Berlin: Springer.
• Schütz, A. (1976b). The Problem of Rationality in the Social World. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Studies in Social Theory (64–88). Berlin: Springer.
• Stigler, G. J. (1983). Nobel Lecture: The Process and Progress of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 91 (4), 529–545. doi: 10.2307/1831067