Article/Publication Details
Views: 3261

BUDDHISM AND PHENOMENOLOGY: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MINDFULNESS MEDITATION

Abstract
Unlike most other philosophical systems of India, Buddhism, though it gives a central place to “consciousness” in its philosophical enquiry, does not raise its status to a transcendental metaphysical level. Buddhism, in this way, has a special affinity with the phenomenological approach. The present paper focuses on the points of a contact between phenomenology and mindfulness meditation, the Buddhist spiritual practice. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part gives an account of the four kinds of mindfulness meditation based on the Buddha’s sermons on mindfulness. Then it focuses on their core features, namely, “objectivity”, “impermanence and other essential features” and “dynamic, yet passive awareness”. These features bring the two approaches close to each other. The second part brings out similarities and differences between the two approaches. The phenomenological approach, like the approach of mindfulness meditation regards consciousness as being of the intentional and propositional nature. It also emphasizes immanent to consciousness and brackets transcendent to it. Both approaches exhibit a scientific temperament and both tend to be presupposition-less. In spite of these close similarities, there are glaring differences between these two approaches. The phenomenological inquiry is aimed at intellectuality, whereas that of the Buddhist approach is spiritual. Phenomenology attributes reality to essences, whereas there is a tendency to deny ontological status to essences in Buddhism. Husserl’s acceptance of transcendental or pure ego contrasts with the no-self theory of Buddhism. Intentionality attributed to consciousness is also alien to all forms of Buddhism. The third part of the paper asserts the similarities and differences between the two approaches open to various possible forms of phenomenological practice. Furthermore, the paper suggests that different models of phenomenology are possible within Buddhism.

Key words
Mindfulness meditation, consciousness, svalakṣaṇa, sāmānyalakṣaṇa, emptiness, intentionality, essences, pure ego, presuppositionless approach, propositional consciousness, objectivity.

References

• Pradhan, P. (Ed.). (1967). Abhidharmakośa and Abhidharmakośabhāṣya of Vasubandhu. Patna: K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute.
• Ñanamoli, T. (Ed.). (2010). Abhidharmakośabhāṣya [The Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic]. Retrieved from http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn /sn22/sn22.059.nymo.html
• Balasubramanian, R. (1992). Advaita Vedānta on the Problem of Enworlded Subjectivity. In D. P. Chattopadyaya, L. Embree & J. Mohanty (Eds.), Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy (77–93). New York: SUNY Press.
• Balslev, A. N. (1992). Analysis of I-consciousness in the Transcendental Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy. In D. P. Chattopadyaya, L. Embree & J. Mohanty (Eds.), Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy (113-140). New York: SUNY Press.
• Burte, D. P. (2015). “Nature” and “Elementary Nature” in Phenomenology and Sāṅkhya. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 32 (1), 31-43.
• Goenka, S. & Twokov, H. (2000). Superscience: An Interview with S. N. Goenka on the Techniques of Buddhist Practice. Tricycle, 10 (2). Retrieved from https://tricycle.org/magazine/superscience/
• Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a pure Penomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Kochumuttom, T. (1982). A Buddhist Doctrine of Experience. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
• Lusthaus, D. (2002). Buddhist Phenomenology, a Philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Ch’eng Wei-Shih Lun. London: Routledge.
• Mohanty, J. N. (1962). Reflections on the Nyāya Theory of Avayavipratyakṣa. Journal of Indian Academy of Philosophy, I (1), 33-41.
• Narada, V. T. (1979). A Manual of Abhidhamma. Malaysia: Buddhist Missionary Society.
• Narada, V. T. (1988). The Buddha and His Teachings. Malaysia: Buddhist Missionary Society.
• Puligandla, R. (1970). Phenomenological Reduction and Yogic Meditation. Philosophy East and West, 20(1), 9-33
• Shuhmann, K. (1992). Husserl and Indian Thought. In D. P. Chattopadyaya, L. Embree & J. Mohanty (Eds.), Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy (20–43). New York: SUNY Press.
• Sinari, R. (1970). The Method of Phenomenological Reduction and Yoga. Philosophy East and West, 15(3-4), 217-228.
• Tarski, A. (1944). The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundation of Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4(3), 341-376.
• Vignemont, F. de. (2015). Bodily Awareness. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/bodily-awareness/
• Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co. Ltd.