Article/Publication Details
Views: 3539

THE PROBLEMATIZATION OF THE “AESTHETICAL EXPERIENCE” IN HENRI MALDINEY’S PHENOMENOLOGY

Abstract
In this paper I undertook a study of Henri Maldiney’s problematization of the way which we aesthetically experience the world in. The notion of aisthesis unites the aesthetic, in its etymological meaning, as related to the sensory perception, and the aesthetic, as related to the theory of art. According to Maldiney, aisthesis, or sensing, cannot be described in Kantian terms of experience as being structured by intelligence; being pre-reflective and ante-predicative, sensing should be classified as épreuve, passive experience that puts one to the test. Sensing is not just the sensory perception: it is holistic and gives the access to the world as a whole; in sensing one senses not the qualities of individual objects but, rather, the world which is not got crystallized in objects yet. Sensing is also a basic level of communicative human experience: through sensing one obtains an access to the world as being shared with others. Sensing is aesthetically important inasmuch as it possesses its own rhythm. I have carried out the analysis of two metaphysical notions, i.e. transpassibility and transpossibility, introduced by Maldiney in order to overcome the classical dichotomies of passibility/impassibility and possibility/impossibility accordingly. Aesthetically, rhythm as opposed to schema, is transpossible; it also constitutes the work of art in a dynamic unity. The hypothesis I come to can be formulated as follows: there is a special synthetic function of rhythm that can be opposed to the synthetic function of intentionality. This synthetic function cannot be normalized and, thus, it paves a way to de-transcendentalized and de-normalized phenomenology. In the conclusion I contemplate the experience of depression as described by Matthew Ratcliffe. Ratcliffe deals with a methodological challenge of how to apply transcendental notions to the empirical. I argue that the language of transpassible and transpossible can be used as a replacement for the Husserian language of transcendental constitution.

Key words
Henri Maldiney, aesthetical experience, aesthetisation, rhythm, french phenomenology, event, eventness, normal and pathologic.

References

• Aristotel’. (1976). O dushe [On the Soul]. In Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh. T.1 [Collected Works in Four Volumes, Vol. 1]. Moscow: Mysl’. (in Russian).
• Barbaras, R., & Maldiney, H. (2014). Maldiney, une singulière presence. Paris: Encre marine.
• Benua, Zh. (2014). C toi storony granitsy [From the Other Side of the Border]. In S. Sholokhova & A. Yampol’skaya (Eds.), (Post)fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post)ohenomenology: New Phenomenology in France and Beyond] (269-284). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Canguilhem, G. (1966). Le Normal et le pathologique. Paris: P.U.F.
• Crowell, S. (2013). Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Escoubas, E. (2010). Henry Maldiney. In H. Sepp, E. S. Casey & L. Embree (Eds), Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics (193-196). Dordrecht; London: Springer.
• Fuchs, T. (2013). Depression, Intercorporeality, and Interaffectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies: Controversies in Science & the Humanities, 20 (7/8), 219-238.
• Gobbs, T. (2017). Leviafan [Leviathan]. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik. (in Russian).
• Goddard, J.-C. (2008). Violence et subjectivé: Derrida, Deleuze, Maldiney. Paris: Vrin.
• Gromova, E. I. (2016). Bezumie i psikhicheskaya bolezn’ v svete filosofii E. Levinasa [Madness and Mental Illness in the Light of E. Levinas’ Philosophy]. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke, 4, 98-107. (in Russian).
• Heidegger, M. (1993). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• Housset, E. (2008). L’intériorité de l’exil. Le soi au risque de d’altérité. Paris: Cerf.
• Kant, I. (1966). Antropologiya s pragmaticheskoi tochki zreniya [Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View]. In Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. T. 6 [Works in Six Volumes, Vol. 6] (349-587). Moscow: Mysl’. (in Russian).
• Keats, J. (2009). Selected Letters of John Keats: Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Klee, P. (1964). Das bildnerische Denken. Basel, Stuttgart: Schwabe.
• Leijenhorst, C. (2002). The Mechanisation of Aristotelianism: The Late Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes’ Natural Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
• Lévinas, E. (1979). Le Temps et l’Autre. Montpellier: Fata Morgana.
• Lévinas, E (2004). Autrement qu’être ou au-délà de l’essence. Paris: Kluwer.
• Maldiney, H. (1991). Penser l’homme et la folie. Grenoble: Jérôme Million.
• Maldiney, H. (2000). Ouvrir le rien, l’art nu. La Versanne: Encre Marine.
• Maldiney, H. (2003). Rencontre et psychose. Cahiers de psychologie clinique, 2 (21), 9–21. doi: 10.3917/cpc.021.0009
• Maldiney, H. (2012). L’art, l’éclaire de l’être. Paris: Cerf.
• Maldiney, H. (2013). Regard Parole Espace. Paris: Cerf.
• Mal’dine, A. (2014). O sverkhstrastnosti [On Transpassibility]. In S. Sholokhova & A. Yampol’skaya (Eds.), (Post)fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post)ohenomenology: New Phenomenology in France and Beyond] (151-203). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Merleau-Ponty, М. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
• Ratcliffe, M. (2015). Experiences of Depression: A Study in Phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Richir, M. (1992). Méditations phénoménologiques: Phénoménologie et phénoménologie du langage. Grenoble: Millon.
• Richir, M. (2015). L’écart et le rien. Conversations avec Sacha Carlson. Grenoble: Millon.
• Sholokhova, S. (2014). Predislovie k perevodu stat’i Anri Mal’dine «O sverkhstrastnosti» [Translator’s introduction to Henry Maldiney’s paper “On the Transpassibility”]. In S. Sholokhova & A. Yampol’skaya (Eds.), (Post)fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post)ohenomenology: New Phenomenology in France and Beyond] (145-150). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Straus, E. (1960). Psychologie der menschlichen Welt. Berlin: Springer.
• Straus, E. (1970). Phenomenology of Memory. In R.M. Griffith & E. Straus (Eds.), Phenomenology of Memory. The Third Lexington Conference on Pure and Applied Phenomenologу (45-66). Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP.
• Vlasova, O. (2010). Fenomenologicheskaya psikhiatriya i ekzistentsial’nyi analiz. Istoriya, mysliteli, problemy [Phenomenological Psychiatry and Existential Analysis. History, Thinkers, Problems]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego. (in Russian).
• Weizsäcker, V. Von. (1946). Anonima. Bern: Francke.
• Yampol’skaya, A. (2018). Iskusstvo fenomenologii [The Art of Phenomenology]. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik. (in Russian).
• Zahavi D. (2003). Husserl’s Intersubjective Transformation of Transcendental Phenomenology. In D. Welton (Ed.), The New Husserl: A Critical Reader (223-254). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.