Studies in Phenomenology



Article/Publication Details
Views: 3594


HEIDEGGER OF THE FUTURE AND THE FUTURE OF HEIDEGGER

Title in the language of publication: ХАЙДЕГГЕР БУДУЩЕГО И БУДУЩЕЕ ХАЙДЕГГЕРА
Author: ALEXANDER MIKHAILOVSKY
Issue: HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology.
Vol. 7, №2 (2018),  337-364
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI : 10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-2-337-364 PDF (Downloads: 3134)

Abstract
Martin Heidegger’s philosophy had a profound influence on the late Soviet and post-Soviet philosophical landscape. Nevertheless, there is no general picture of perception and critique of Heidegger’s philosophy in Russia. This article deals with Heidegger’s entry into the Russian philosophical scene as a philosopher of the future – a conservative critic of late modernity, a thinker of Being, and a “post” philosopher. On the one hand, by virtue of the influence French post-modernism had on late Soviet and post-Soviet philosophy, Russia has developed a special interest in Heidegger’s deconstruction theory. On the other hand, the reception of critique given by Heidegger to European nihilism, totalitarianism and machine technology, as the manifestations of modernity, has prompted significantly the interest in “political ontology”. The specifics of reception of Heidegger in Russia can also be traced to a refusal to make a strict division between the pure “core” of Heidegger’s philosophy and “accidental” circumstances associated with social and political aspects of his work in 1930s. The ongoing discussion about recently published Black Notebooks manifests not just the fact that there is a separate language of description and analysis existing in Russian philosophical field but also the original tendency for holistic consideration of Heidegger’s thinking, which includes not just his existential and historical reflections but also political passages and critique of civilizational discourse. Besides the reviews of Black Notebooks made by N. V. Motroshilova, V. V. Mironov and D. Mironova in the last year’s issues of Voprosy Filosofii (a philosophical journal), the attention is focused on the earlier works by N. V. Motroshilova, V. V. Bibikhin, A. V. Gulyga, V. A. Podoroga and A. G. Dugin, related to Heidegger’s overcoming of the Western metaphysical tradition and his concept of a new beginning beyond Machenschaft. The article is also devoted to considertion given to a new book by J. Love (2017) examining the philosophical influence Heidegger exerts in Eastern Europe and Russia.

Key words
Martin Heidegger, Black Notebooks, thinking of the history of Being, the other beginning, reception of Heidegger’s thought in the late Soviet and post-Soviet philosophy in Russia, Vladimir Bibikhin, Nelli Motroshilova, Arseniy Gulyga, Alexander Dugin.

References

  • Anashvili, V., & Pogorel’skii, A. (2006). Zhurnal Logos 1991–2005. Izbrannoe: v 2 tomakh. T. 2 [Journal Logos 1991-2005. Selected Issues: in 2 Volumes, Vol. 2]. Moscow: Territoria budushchego. (in Russian).
  • Arendt, H., & Khaidegger, M. (2015). Pis’ma 1925–1975 i drugie svidetel’stva [Letters 1925–1975 and Оther Documents]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaidara. (in Russian).
  • Bibikhin, V. (1991). Delo Khaideggera [Heidegger’s Case]. In N. V. Motroshilova (Ed.), Filosofiya Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’. Materialy konferencii [Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy and Modernity. Proceedings of the Conference] (166–171). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Bibikhin, V. (1993). Delo Khaideggera [Heidegger’s Case]. In M. Khaidegger & V. Bibikhin, Vremya i bytie. Stat’i i vystupleniya [Time and Being. Articles and Addresses] (3–14). Moscow: Respublica. (in Russian).
  • Bibikhin, V. (2002). Sila mysli [The Power of Thought]. In R. Safranski, Khaidegger. Germanskii master i ego vremya [Heidegger. The German Master and his Time] (5–17). Мoscow: Molodaya gvardiya. (in Russian).
  • Bibikhin, V. (2003). Drugoe nachalo [The Other Beginning]. St Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Bibikhin, V. (2006). Iz tvorcheskogo naslediya [The Papers and Collections]. Moscow: INION. (in Russian).
  • Bibikhin, V. (2009). Rannii Khaidegger: materialy k seminaru [The Early Heidegger: Seminar Matherials]. Moscow: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii Svyatogo Fomy. (in Russian).
  • Blume, G. (2014). Martin Heidegger. Er ist der falsche Verdächtige. Ein Gespräch mit dem französischen Philosophen François Fédier über den Antisemitismus Heideggers und die „Schwarzen Hefte“. Die Zeit, 3. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/2014/03/francois-fedier-ueber-martin-heidegger
  • Dugin, A. (2010). Martin Khaidegger: filosofiya drugogo nachala [Martin Heidegger: Philosophy of the Other Beginning]. Мoscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
  • Dugin, A. (2011). Martin Khaidegger: Vozmozhnost’ russkoi filosofii [Martin Heidegger: the Possibility of the Russian Philosophy]. Мoscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
  • Dugin, A. (2014). Martin Khaidegger. Poslednii bog [Martin Heidegger. The Last God]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
  • Dugin, A. (2017). Plural Anthropology (the Fundamental-Ontological Analysis of Peoples). In J. Love (Ed.), Heidegger in Russia and Eastern Europe (273–294). London, New-York: Rawman and Littlefield.
  • Falev, E. (2016). «Chernye tetradi» i novyi vitok sudov nad Khaideggerom [“Black Notebooks” and New Turn in the Heidegger Controversy]. Filosofskoje obrazovanie, 2 (34), 35–45. (in Russian).
  • Gabriel, M. (2015). Natsist iz zasady [The Nazi from an Ambush]. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 163–164. (in Russian).
  • Gal’tseva, R. (Еd.). (1981). Raboty Khaideggera po kul’turologii i teorii ideologii [Heidegger’s Works on Cultural Studies and Theory of Ideology]. Moscow: INION. (in Russian).
  • Gulyga, A. (1988a). Delo Khaideggera [Heidegger’s Case]. Literaturnaya gazeta, 30. (in Russian).
  • Gulyga, A. (1988b). Chto takoe postsovremennost’? [What is Postmodernity?]. Voprosy filosofii, 12, 153–159. (in Russian).
  • Gulyga, A. (1990). О postmodernizme [On Postmodernism]. Dialog, 12, 96–98. (in Russian).
  • Heidegger, M. (1965). Unterwegs zur Sprache. Pfullingen: Neske.
  • Heidegger, M. (1998). Die Geschichte des Seyns (GA 69). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2014a). Überlegungen II–VI (Schwarze Hefte 1931–1938) (GA 94). Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2014b). Überlegungen VII–XI (Schwarze Hefte 1938–39) (GA 95). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2014c). Überlegungen XII–XV (Schwarze Hefte 1939–1941) (GA 96). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Heidegger, M. (2015). Anmerkungen I–V (Schwarze Hefte 1942–1948) (GA 97). Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
  • Homolka, W., & Heidegger, A. (Eds.). (2016). Heidegger und der Antisemitismus. Positionen im Widerstreit. Freiburg i. B.: Herder.
  • Khaidegger, M., & Yaspers, К. (2001). Perepiska 1920–1963 [Correspondence 1920–1963]. Мoscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russian).
  • Khaidegger, M. (2016). Razmyshlenia II–VI (Chernye tetradi 1931–1938) [Considerations II–VI (Black Notebooks 1931–1938)]. Мoscow: Izdatel’stvo instituta Gaidara. (in Russian).
  • Khaidegger, M. (2018). Razmyshlenia VII–XI (Chernye tetradi 1938–1939) [Considerations VII–XI (Black Notebooks 1938–1939)]. Мoscow: Izdatel’stvo instituta Gaidara. (in Russian).
  • Karpets, V. (2016). Vokrug «Сhernykh tetradei» [Around “Black Notebooks”]. Katechon, 16/12. Retrieved from http://katehon.com/ru/article/vokrug-chernyh-tetradey
  • Love, J. (2017). The Post-Soviet Heidegger. In J. Love (Ed.), Heidegger in Russia and Eastern Europe (249–272). London, New-York: Rawman and Littlefield.
  • Mehring, R. (2016). Postmortaler Suizid. Zur Selbstdemontage des Autors der Gesamtausgabe. In W. Homolka & A. Heidegger (Eds.), Heidegger und der Antisemitismus. Positionen im Widerstreit (289–299). Freiburg i. B.: Herder.
  • Meng, M. (2017). Russia in the Age of Machenschaft. In J. Love (Ed.), Heidegger in Russia and Eastern Europe (3–30). London, New-York: Rawman and Littlefield.
  • Mikhailovskii, A. (2016). Rannyaya mysl’ M. Khaideggera o tekhnike: mezhdu kritikoi kul’tury i geroicheskim realizmom [M. Heidegger’s Early Theory of Technology: Between Cultural Criticism and Heroic Realism]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 16(4), 387–393. (in Russian).
  • Mikhailovskii, A. (2017). O nekotorykh osobennostyakh rossiiskoi retseptsii filosofii Martina Khaideggera v svyazi s diskussiei vokrug «Chernykh tetradei» [Some Remarks on the Characteristics of the Reception of Heidegger’s Thought in Russia Regarding the Debate on “Black Notebooks”]. Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Serija «Filosofija. Filologija», 21(1), 54–71. (in Russian).
  • Mironov, V., & Mironova, D. (2016). Filosof i vlast’: sluchai Khaideggera [Philosopher and Power: Casus Heidegger]. Voprosy filosofii, 7, 21–36. (in Russian).
  • Motroshilova, N. (Ed.). (1991). Filosofiya Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’. Materialy konferentsii [Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy and Modernity. Proceedings of the Conference]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Motroshilova, N. (2015). «Chernye tetradi» M. Khaideggera: po sledam publikatsii [M. Heidegger’s “Black Notebooks”: Following up the Publication]. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 121–162. (in Russian).
  • Motroshilova, N. (2016). I snova o «Chernykh tetradyakh» Martina Khaideggera (k debatam leta — oseni 2015 g.) [Once more on Martin Heidegger’s “Black Notebooks” (to the Dispute in Summer — Autumn of 2015)]. Voprosy filosofii, 7, 39–54. (in Russian).
  • Naranovich, S. (2016). Kolossal’nyi opyt i schast’e, chto fyurer probudil novuyu deistvitel’nost’ [The Colossal Experience and Happiness that the Fuehrer Awakened New Reality]. Gorky, 03/10. Retrieved from https://gorky.media/context/kolossalnyj-opyt-i-schaste-chto-fyurer-probudil-novuyu-dejstvitelnost/
  • Osipov, V. (2012). Vozrozhdenie russkoi ideologii [The Rebirth of Russian Ideology]. Moscow: Algoritm, Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii. (in Russian).
  • Podoroga, V. (1986). «Fundamental’naya antropologiya» M. Khaideggera [Fundamental Anthropology of M. Heidegger]. In B. Grigor’yan (Ed.), Burzhuaznaya filosofskaya antropologiya XX veka [The Bourgeois Philosophical Anthropology of the 20th Century] (34–48). Мoscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Podoroga, V. (1991). Erectio. Geo-logiya yazyka i filosofstvovanie M. Khaideggera [Erectio. Geo-logy of Language and M. Heidegger’s Philosophizing]. In N. Motroshilova (Ed.), Filosofiya Martina Khaideggera i sovremennost’. Materialy konferentsii [Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy and Modernity. Proceedings of the Conference] (102–120). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Podoroga, V. (1993). Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnye strategii v filosofskoi kul’ture XIX — XX vv. [Metaphysics of Landscape. Communicative Strategies in the Philosophical Culture of XIX — XX Centuries]. Мoscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  • Podoroga, V. (2013). Metafizika landshafta [Metaphysics of Landscape]. Moscow: Kanon+. (in Russian).
  • Ryasov, А. (2016). Khaidegger i «sudebnaya» rech’. K polemike vokrug «Chernykh tetradei» [Heidegger and the “Courtroom” Speech. On the Controversy Surrounding of “Black Notebooks”]. Gefter, 16/11. Retrieved from http://gefter.ru/ archive/20043