Article/Publication Details
Views: 2827

VISION OF GOD AND THINKING OF BEING: VLADIMIR LOSSKY AND MARTIN HEIDEGGER

Abstract
The paper is devoted to the dialogue between Orthodox theology of the latter half of the 20th century and Heidegger’s philosophy. We focus on the interpretation of the apophasis in the works of Vladimir Lossky. Our research tasks are not so much the description of the direct influence of Heidegger’s philosophy on the Lossky’s theological reflections, but, rather, a demonstration of the parallels between Heidegger’s existential and historical thinking and Lossky’s negative theology. In the first part we highlight the points common to early Heidegger’s interpretation of the mystical theory of cognition and Lossky’s understanding of the mystical theology of the Eastern Church: the correlation between theology and mystical experiencing, overcoming the conceptual frameworks, the knowledge of God as a transformative practice, which is aimed at the radical unity with God. There are also common features in both in Heidegger’s and Lossky’s critical interpretations of the identity of the concepts of God and being in Meister Eckhart’s mystical theology. Lossky opposes Eckhart’s God as Esse absconditum with the apophaticism of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite who has thought out God beyond being. Heidegger insists on the theological differentiation distinguishing between God and being. We also compare the concept of detachment given in the works of Eckhart, Lossky and later Heidegger. Lossky’s explanation of the human personality is focused on irreducibility of a person to nature; he referred to the ecstatic character of existence of Dasein, but his anthropology is constituted on doctrine of a human being seen as the image and likeness of God. Further development of Orthodox apophaticism (Chr. Yannaras, D. B. Hart and J. P. Manoussakis) demonstrates a critical attitude towards Heidegger’s philosophy. Such attitude originates in their attempts to develop the ontology of personal being. We argue that Orthodox thinkers correlate with Heidegger in their search for a renewal of theological method, for the identical-differential mode of thinking moving from subject-object speculation to the ecstatic transformations of subject. The difference is in the emphasis on the personal character of the mystical ecstasy, founded on the trinitarian provisions inherent to the Eastern Church.

Key words
Аpophaticism, mystical experience, Heidegger, Lossky, ontology, detachment, language, difference, person.

References

• Buren, J. Van. (1994). The Young Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Caputo, J. D. (1978). The Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought. Athens: Ohio University Press.
• Coriando, P.- L. (1998). Der letzte Gott als Anfang: zur ab-gründigen Zeit-Räumlichkeit des Übergangs in Heideggers „Beiträgen zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis)“. München: Fink.
• Danner, H. (1971). Das Gottliche und der Gott bei Heidegger. Meisenheim a.Glan: Hain.
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1983). Heideggers Wege. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
• Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1974). Das Verhältnis von Philosophie und Theologie im Denken Martin Heideggers. Freiburg, München: Alber.
• Hart, D. B. (2003). The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
• Heidegger, M. (1985a). Aus einem Gespräch von der Sprache. In Unterwegs zur Sprache (GA12) (79–146). Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.
• Heidegger, M. (1985b). Die Sprache. In Unterwegs zur Sprache (GA12) (7–30). Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.
• Heidegger, M. (1989). Beiträge zur Philosophie. (Vom Ereignis) (1936-1939) (GA 65). Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.
• Heidegger, M. (1995). Die philosophischen Grundlagen der mittelalterlichen Mystik. In Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens (GA 60) (303–339). Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.
• Heidegger, M. (2006). Die Ontotheologische Verfassung der Metaphysik. In Identität und Differenz (GA 11) (59-60). Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Heidegger, M. (2013). Zum Ereignis-Denken (GA 73). Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Jung, M. (1990). Das Denken des Seins und der Glaube an Gott: Zum Verhältnis von Philosophie und Theologie bei Heidegger. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann.
• Khaidegger, M. (1993). Vremya i Bytie [Time and Being]. In Vremya i Bytie [Time and Being] (391-406). Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (1998). Prolegomeny k istorii ponyatiya vremeni [History of the Concept of Time]. Tomsk: Vodolej. (in Russian).
• Konacheva, S. (2015). Sovpadenie krasoty i beskonechnosti kak osnovanie khristianskoi ontologii [The Identity of Beauty and Infinite as Source of Christian Ontology]. Ezhegodnik po fenomenologicheskoj filosofii [Annual for Phenomenological Philosophy], 4, 73-86. Moscow: RGGU. (in Russian).
• Losskii, V. (1991). Ocherk misticheskogo bogosloviya Vostochnoj cerkvi [Essay on the Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church]. In Misticheskoe bogoslovie [The Mystical Theology]. Kiev: Put’ k istine. (in Russian).
• Losskii, V. (1995). Po obrazu i podobiyu [Image and Likeness]. Moscow: Svyato-Vladimirskoe bratstvo. (in Russian).
• Losskii, V. (2003). Otritsatel’noe bogoslovie i poznanie Boga u Meistera Ekkharta [Negative Theology and Knowledge of God by Meister Eckhart]. Bogoslovskie Trudy, 38, 147-236. (in Russian).
• Losskii, V. (2005). Otritsatel’noe bogoslovie i poznanie Boga u Meistera Ekkharta [Negative Theology and Knowledge of God by Meister Eckhart]. Bogoslovskie Trudy, 40, 38-46. (in Russian).
• Löwith, K. (1953). Heidegger: Denker in Dürftiger Zeit. Frankfurt a.M.: S. Fischer.
• Manoussakis, J. P. (2006). Toward a Fourth Reduction? In J. P. Manoussakis (Ed.), After God: Richard Kearney and Religious Turn in Continental Philosophy (21-39). New York: Fordham University Press.
• Manoussakis, J. P. (2007). God after Metaphysics: a Theological Aesthetic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Möller, J. (1952). Existenzialphilosophie und katholische Theologie. Baden-Baden: Verlag für Kunst und Wissenschaft.
• Pöggeler, O. (2009). Philosophie und hermeneutische Theologie: Heidegger, Bultmann und die Folgen. München: Fink.
• Safranski, R. (2002). Khaidegger: germanskij master i ego vremya [Heidegger: German Master and his Time]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. (in Russian).
• Schäffler, R. (1978). Frömmigkeit des Denkens? Martin Heidegger und die katolische Theologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
• Węcławsky, T. (1985). Zwischen Sprache und Schweigen: Eine Erörterung der theologischen Apophase im Gespräch mit Vladimir N. Lossky und Martin Heidegger. München: Minerva-Publikation
• Yannaras, C. (2005). Lichnost’ i eros [Person and Eros]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (in Russian).
• Zaborowski, H. (2004) „Herkunft aber bleibt stets Zukunft“. In Heidegger-Jahrbuch 1: Heidegger und die Anfänge seines Denkens (123–158). Freiburg, München: Verlag Karl Alber.