Article/Publication Details
Views: 3819

MUNDUS, PAX, COMMUNITAS: ON DIFFERENT MEANINGS OF THE WORLD-CONCEPT IN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

Abstract
In this article we have tried to trace the correlations between different meanings of the world-concept in Russian language. The problematic point is that the same Russian word (“mir”) has three meanings separated in other Indo-European languages (mundus, pax, communitas). The analysis of this issue is preceded by an exposition of the world-problem in modern philosophy, with an emphasis put on the so-called “cosmological difference” introduced by Eugen Fink. It turned out that both for Russian and other languages, the core of the considered concept is a habitable space which the order, agreement and concordance between people take place in. Thus, such aspects of the world as community (communitas) and as peace, harmony (pax) intersect here. Further, the derived meanings of the concept of communitas were considered, starting from the peasant and Church community to the “historical world” and the “secular world” (in its Christian interpretation). In conclusion, we turned to the experience of some special sentiments having a cosmological value. First of all, it is the unique experience of the universal harmony (harmonia mundi), i.e. the experience of the world as peace (eirēnē, pax) in cosmological perspective. In addition, existential-practical conditions of the possibility of such experience (location, disposition and care) were considered. We also drew attention to some natural and social factors that prevent participation in the experience of the cosmological harmony. As a problematization of such experience, it was emphasized that from the theological standpoint the idea of the world, as the whole, can be realized only in the eschatological outlook, since the world in its present state is split, subjected to disorganization and only partly serves as an image (“icon”) reminding of its Creator.

Key words
World, cosmos, peace, concordance, Heidegger, Fink, Bibikhin.

References

• Antonii, mitropolit Surozhskii. (2012). Uverennost’ v veshchakh nevidimykh. Poslednie besedy (2000-2001) [Confidence in the Things Invisible. The Last Conversations (2000-2001)]. Moscow: Nikeya. (in Russian).
• Afanas’eva, N. (2013). Mir mirovi podazhd’, Chelovekolyubche! [Let Peace be upon the World, oh the Lover of Mankind!]. Parfenon segodnya: pravoslavnyi zhurnal [Parthenon Today: Orthodox Magazine], 5 (2), 2-7. (in Russian).
• Batkin, L. (1978). Ital’yanskie gumanisty: stil’ zhizni i stil’ myshleniya [Italian Humanists: Style of Life, Style of Thinking]. Moscow: Science. (in Russian).
• Bibikhin, V. (1995). Mir [The World]. Tomsk: Vodolei. (in Russian).
• Dil’tei, V. (2004). Postroenie istoricheskogo mira v naukakh o dukhe [The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences]. In Sobranie sochinenii v shesti tomakh. T. 3 [Collected Works in 6 Volumes, Vol. 3]. Moscow: Tri kvadrata, 2004. (in Russian).
• Fink, E. (1977). Sein und Mensch: Vom Wesen der ontologischen Erfahrung. Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag.
• Gabriel, M. (2013). Warum es die Welt nicht gibt. Berlin: Ullstein.
• Grigorii Bogoslov, Svt. (1912). Tvoreniya. T. 1 [Works, Vol. 1]. St Petersburg: Tipografiya P.P. Soikina. (in Russian).
• Gurevich, A. (1984). Kategorii srednevekovoi kul’tury [Categories of the Middle Age Culture]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
• Gusserl’, E. (2004). Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology]. St Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo «Vladimir Dal’». (in Russian).
• Ionkus, D. (2004). Problema mira v fenomenologii E. Finka [The Problem of the World in E. Fink’s Phenomenology]. Topos, 9 (2), 51-61. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (1993). Veshch’ [The Thing]. In M. Khaidegger, Vremya i bytie [Time and Being] (316-326). Мoscow: Respublika. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (1997). Bytie i vremya [Being and Time]. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russian).
• Khaidegger, M. (1998). O sushchestve osnovaniya. [On the Essence of Ground]. In Filosofiya v poiskakh ontologii: Sbornik trudov Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vyp. 5 [Philosophy in Search of Ontology. Collection of the Works of Samara Humanitarian Academy, Issue 5] (78-130). Samara: Izdatel’stvo SamGA. (in Russian).
• Marion, Zh.-L. (2014). Nasyshchennyi fenomen [The Saturated Phenomenon]. In S. Sholokhova & A. Yampol’skaya (Eds.), (Post)fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami [(Post)phenomenology: New Phenomenology in France and Beyond] (63-99). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).
• Merlo-Ponti, M. (1999). Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of Perception]. St Petersburg: Yuventa, Nauka. (in Russian).
• Ortega-i-Gasset, J. (1991). Chto takoe filosofiya? [What is Philosophy?]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
• Stepanov, Yu. (2004). Mir [The Universe]. In Konstanty: Slovar’ russkoi kultury [The Constants: A Dictionary of Russian Culture] (86-126). Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. (in Russian).